The Premiere Website For Police News In Texas

          

                        
                         

                                   

 

Verdict For A Police Officer Against LAPD in Anti-Retaliation Employment Sui
Los Angeles
   
 
More Today's News:
ߦ   2016 Lone Star Awards Houston Press Club Finalists
ߦ   Attorneys General Opinion - What qualifies as a “judicial function” of a county judge
ߦ   Attorneys General Opinion On County Providing Funds To Non Profits
ߦ   Bonnie View Road Robbery Suspect
ߦ   Former VP Sentenced for Embezzling From Houston Police Federal Credit Union
ߦ   Homicide Division Need Public's Help In Third Anniversary Of Murder
ߦ   Houston Man Convicted of Producing and Distributing Animal Crush Videos
ߦ   Investigation into Shooting Incident at 11900 City Park Central Lane
ߦ   Lewisville Police Chief's Weekly Executive Summary
ߦ   Lytle Police Chief's Weekly Report
ߦ   Pharr Resident Sentenced in Firearms Case
ߦ   Riverfront Boulevard Homicide
ߦ   Stabbing 8494 Stults Road
ߦ   Two Sent to Prison for Meth Distribution
ߦ   Police News From Across The U.S.
ߦ   Burnet County Sheriff's Office Inmate/Arrests Summary
ߦ   Couple Whose Son Vanished Without a Trace in 1977 Just Received This Mystery Letter — and Even Police Are Stunned
ߦ   Deer Park, Pasadena, Baytown Prescription Take Back a Success
ߦ   DOJ Decides It Won’t Call People ‘Felons’ Or ‘Convicts’ Because Hurts Their Feelings
ߦ   driver Arrested, Charged in Fatal Crash at 18800 Gulf Freeway
ߦ   Driver Dies in Fatal Crash at 6000 Pinemont
ߦ   Fatal Hit-and-Run Crash at 10100 Homestead
ߦ   Fatal Shooting at 8701 Gustine Lane
ߦ   Fatal Shooting Investigation at 8126 Jutland
ߦ   First Baltimore Police Officer Charged in Freddie Gray Case Acquitted on All Charges

   Next >>
 
Search Archives:

McNicholas & McNicholas Secure Appeal Confirmation On Their Verdict For A Police Officer Against LAPD in Anti-Retaliation Employment Suit

-- Appellate Court Affirms Retaliation Verdict in Favor of LAPD Officer for Testifying Against LAPD in Trial --

 

LOS ANGELES, CA – Matthew McNicholas, partner with Los Angeles-based plaintiff’s trial law firm, McNicholas & McNicholas, obtained a decision from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirming the district court’s judgment, after a jury trial (which Mr. McNicholas tried to verdict in the trial court) in favor of Leonard Avila, an LAPD officer who claimed that the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) fired him in retaliation for testifying in a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) lawsuit brought by a fellow officer. The panel held that even after an officer was terminated through the Department’s Board of Rights, he could still sue in court for discrimination.

 

“The LAPD has always taken the position that if they fire you through their Board, you cannot sue them in court without appealing their Board. This case demonstrates this is not accurate,” said Mr. McNicholas.  “We are extremely gratified that the Court of Appeals confirmed the jury’s verdict and the trial court’s rulings, and are proud to continue to protect employees’ rights.”

 

Background

In January 2008, Mr. Avila testified under subpoena in a FLSA suit against the LAPD and City of Los Angeles in the Central District of California brought by fellow officer Edward Maciel, who sought overtime pay for working his lunch hours. Mr. Avila testified that he and many other LAPD officers, including his supervisors, operated under an unwritten policy of not claiming overtime for working through lunch.  After Mr. Avila testified, the LAPD filed an internal investigation complaint against him and another officer, Richard Romney, who testified at the Maciel trial alleging that they had been insubordinate by not submitting requests for overtime. The LAPD Board of Rights found Mr. Avila and Mr. Romney guilty of insubordination and both were terminated.

 

Mr. Avila sued the LAPD and City of Los Angeles claiming that the real reason he was fired was not because he worked through lunch without requesting overtime, but because he testified in the prior lawsuit. The jury ruled in favor of Mr. Avila and awarded damages of $50,000. The district court entered a judgment on the jury verdict, and later amended it to award Mr. Avila $50,000 in liquidated damages and $579,400 in attorney’s fees.  The total judgment, before interest, was $679,400

 

Mr. McNicholas also represented Mr. Romney in an identical case and obtained a $3,999,945 verdict.  This verdict was larger than Mr. Avila’s because Mr. Romney was never able to be rehired while Mr. Avila was.

###

McNicholas & McNicholas, a Los Angeles-based plaintiff’s trial law firm, represents clients in the areas of catastrophic personal injury, employment law, class actions, sexual abuse and other consumer-oriented matters such as civil rights, aviation disasters and product liability. Founded by a family of attorneys spanning three generations, McNicholas & McNicholas has been trying cases to jury verdict on behalf of their clients for more than five decades.

McNicholas & McNicholas, LLP

10866 Wilshire Blvd.

Suite 1400

Los Angeles, CA 90024

Phone: 866-664-3055

Fax: 310-475-7871

Website: www.mcnicholaslaw.com

Post a comment
Name/Nickname:
(required)
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
  Facebook   Share link on Twitter Tweet  
© 1999-2016 The Police News. All rights reserved.