The largest stretch of the
wall is expected to rise later this year in the Rio Grande Valley and
have the most potential to deter immigrants and drug smugglers.
By Molly Hennessy-Fiske
Los Angeles Times
ROMA, Texas — The moon narrowed to a sliver as
several migrants paddled a raft across the Rio Grande to the banks of
this small Texas border town and scrambled up well-worn dirt trails
through thorny mesquite into a cluster of shabby houses.
no wall to stop them. That job fell to half a dozen Border Patrol
agents on bicycle and foot patrol last month. Flashlights bobbing, the
agents found a pregnant Central American migrant stopped by a Family
Dollar parking lot. She surrendered in hopes of applying for asylum. The
others had disappeared.
“We do not have control,” said Manual Padilla Jr., the Border
Patrol’s sector chief for the Rio Grande Valley. In the area around
Roma, he said, traffic has shifted to where the agency does not have
sufficient personnel, technology and infrastructure — including a wall.
where and how to build the wall? That’s the complicated question in the
Rio Grande Valley, the busiest stretch of the southern border for
migrant apprehensions and marijuana seizures.
When Congress in
March approved $1.6 billion for border wall and fencing, it covered 100
miles of barriers in California, New Mexico and Texas. The largest
stretch — 33 miles — is expected to rise later this year in the Rio
Grande Valley and have the most potential to deter immigrants and drug
smugglers. But it’s still not clear where the limited barrier will go.
… are operationally driven,” Border Patrol officials said in a
statement, noting that the agency “considers strategic objectives,
border census data, and the feasibility of constructing physical
barriers along the border.” Agency officials and experts analyze that
material and additional factors — such as risk and intelligence — to
decide where to build.
The land along the Rio Grande is perhaps
the trickiest stretch of new wall to build. The river winds for 350
miles, and with it the border, a floodplain where construction is
restricted by water treaties with Mexico. Residents and businesses own
property south of existing border barriers, land that’s still legally
part of the U.S., so the Border Patrol adds entrances to allow agents
and landowners access south of the wall.
Officials have not
released maps of where the new wall will be built, but confirmed that it
will be erected in adjacent Hidalgo and Starr counties.
counties, Border Patrol agents’ radios are usually abuzz before dawn.
One morning last month east of Roma in Starr County they caught a dozen
men crossing the river, a family of two in a nearby park, and were about
to catch another eight men across from a section of unfenced border —
all before 8 a.m.
Agents fanned out north of the river in Hidalgo
County on well-worn smugglers’ trails through shoulder-high nopal cacti.
They chased the men, a mix of Mexican and Salvadoran migrants, tackled
and cuffed them.
“This is the busiest sector in the nation,” Agent Robert Rodriguez said after the chase. “So this is a normal thing.”
Hidalgo County, 25 miles of fencing will be built atop levees at a cost
of $445 million, blocking access to the river except for a three-mile
stretch at the Santa Ana National Wildlife Refuge, where the Sierra Club
and others had opposed a wall. Requests for proposals are being issued
for wall designs, and Border Patrol officials have already held several
meetings with at least one landowner to make accommodations, such as
adding concrete irrigation sleeves and enlarging wall gates for farm
In Starr County to the west, eight miles of similar
bollard fencing will be built atop concrete wall at a cost of $196
million. The Border Patrol has yet to determine where the fence will be
built, according to Loren Flossman, director of the agency’s Air and
Marine Program Management, who has coordinated border wall building for
more than a decade. If the project comes in under budget, they may build
more wall in Starr County, he said.
“The Rio Grande has a set of
challenges nowhere else has in that the wall is not on the border, and
there’s some homes we have to accommodate access to,” Flossman said.
said officials were still doing hydrological studies “to see if there’s
a rise in water in the Rio Grande, so that whatever barrier we have
does not deflect water into Mexico,” in violation of international
treaties. He said it wasn’t clear whether the wall would rise in Roma or
farther west in less-inhabited areas.
Flossman makes the final
wall-building plans after consulting with Border Patrol officials and
local residents. He takes into account possible conflicts with
landowners, prioritizing areas where the government can build more
“Where we would start is where the government has an interest and there aren’t other private owners involved,” Flossman said.
met with valley residents and community groups this month to discuss
plans and arrange rights of entry to survey properties now that Congress
has funded construction. Such surveys are required to start
environmental, design and real estate plans.
“Before, we didn’t have a budget and couldn’t say what we would be doing. Now we can,” he said.
Officials say more walls are needed but acknowledge their limitations.
think it will make a big difference here,” said Rio Grande Valley
Border Patrol Deputy Sector Chief Raul Ortiz. He added, however, that
“when you place infrastructure in one area, it pushes folks to areas
where you don’t have that.”
Agents call the phenomenon “the water
balloon effect.” Ortiz said the agency plans to secure spaces between
the wall with technology like aerostat blimps and towers.
“We’re just not going to leave gaps,” he said.
Rep. Henry Cuellar, a Democrat, said he hopes residents’ feedback is taken into account.
someone who has represented border districts for years and years, I
understand how my constituents will be directly impacted by the proposed
construction of border walls. Border communities like Hidalgo County
and Starr County will lose their property, and lives will be disrupted
for no other reason than for political theatre,” Cuellar said. “The
administration should view border communities and stakeholders as active
participants in this process, not as spectators.”
co-chairman of the local Sierra Club’s borderlands team, met with Border
Patrol officials about wall plans and said the agency seemed to want to
build as quickly as possible, regardless of whether the barrier serves a
tactical purpose. Opponents persuaded officials not to build in the
Santa Ana refuge, and now they’re trying to stop construction at other
refuges, including a popular butterfly center.
Nicol said the
Border Patrol needs to release maps of potential wall locations in Starr
County. “All the people in the path of that deserve to know,” he said.
“People deserve to be able to plan.”
The Border Patrol released
maps last summer that showed new stretches of wall to the east of Roma
in Los Ebanos, a river outpost of several hundred where landowners who
would be stuck to the south of a barrier already sued to block the wall.
by its namesake ebony trees, Los Ebanos is home to a small border
crossing served by a hand-drawn ferry founded in 1950, now the last of
its kind on the Rio Grande.
Border Patrol boats cruised by the
ferry one recent day, as an agency helicopter and aerostat hovered
overhead. They’re reassuring sights for resident Sulema Munoz Cantu, who
credits agents with decreasing the flow of migrants through town in
Munoz, 65, and her husband would rather see more
agents sent to patrol the area than a wall, which they said won’t stop
“It’s nonsense,” said husband Israel Cantu Amador, also 65. “Iron gates, wooden gates — they’re going to come through.”
In Roma, Noel Benavides also opposes the wall that may cross his land.
federal government already condemned a mile-long, 60-foot-wide swath of
his property north of the river after the Secure Fence Act passed in
2006, the last major border building project. The land had been deeded
to the Benavides family as part of a Spanish land grant in 1767.
But construction on the wall never started. Benavides still hasn’t heard whether the new wall would be built on his property.
the tract, Benavides said that a wall would be a logistical nightmare
in the floodplain, that the Border Patrol would be better off investing
the money in manpower. He attended local meetings of the Sierra Club,
slapped “No Wall” stickers on his pickup truck and at his western wear
store. If the government moves to start construction on his land, he
plans to hire a lawyer to stop them.
“I believe in our nation’s
safety as much as anyone else — maybe more because I see it every day,”
Benavides said. But he also believes a short stretch of wall would not
stop the border traffic. “It’s going to go somewhere else.”
Are the people planning to build a border wall near the Rio Grande border out of their minds? Has anyone looked closely at Google Maps? The Rio Grande River in South Texas does not flow in a straight line. In some places, you can actually cross the river from North to South and enter the United States from Mexico.
?I lived in South Texas. My area of responsibility was from Laredo South to the Gulf of Mexico. A large part of this area was like being in Mexico. It is a harsh and unforgiving environment. It is wise to always travel with extra water in case you become stranded.
?I am against building a wall in South Texas because of environmental concerns. The diversity of wildlife that crosses the U.S. Mexican border is astounding. There is an ecosystem in South Texas unlike any other place. There is the Los Palomas Wildlife Management Area, the Bentsen Rio Grande Valley State Park and Bird Sanctuary, Santa Anna National Wildlife Refuge, Resaca De La Palma State Park and World Birding Center and the Boca Chica Wildlife Management area near the mouth of the Rio Grande river at the Gulf of Mexico.
?I'm against illegal immigration. If the U.S. builds a wall it will have to be North of the Rio Grande and will in effect create a staging area for illegal immigrants. The border area is already home to several Colonias that don't have access to basic services like clean water and even though most of the residents are a mix of illegals and American born citizens that provide labor for agriculture. In 2018 the State of Texas cut funding to these areas where in my opinion illegals assimilate into the population. I firmly believe that additional Colonias will become established between the Rio Grande and the border wall.
?There is also the matter of the Rio Grande itself. Nearly 1900 miles of river cannot be tamed. If you don't agree just look at the dismal job the U.S. Corp of Engineers have done trying to control the Mississippi River including the New Orleans disaster. I'm not saying the Rio Grande compares in size to the Mississippi River but water will always find the path of least resistance and a wall on or near the Rio Grande River may cause flooding unlike we have never seen before.
?I'm familiar with the plans put forth by the government. After a disaster they won't mean a thing.
?The people from third world countries filled with poverty, corruption and disease will always try enter the United States. If I were Honduran which now has the highest murder rate in the world, I would try to enter the U.S. any way I could.
?If you want to stop illegal immigration, you have to put boots on the ground. I believe that beefing up the border patrol by placing stations with in line of sight of each other that are manned 24 hours a day would curtail the crossings and probably be cheaper than building a wall.
Posted by Txlt44 at 5/7/2018 6:28:00 PM
I agree. A wall is a horrible choice. I realize this is a desperate try at a solution to an ongoing problem but it will never work without additional border security to enforce it. Regardless,we will have to have many more patrols, so just hire them already. Whoever makes up these crazy ideas needs to physicaLly experience what they're up against and make rational decisions.