Eighth Circuit Court Rules That Citizens Have No Right To Record Police In Public
St. Louis, MO
More Today's News:
ߦ   Crimes, Criminals and The Cops Who Chase Them
THE ELEVEN - a new television series about the murders linked to Edward Harold Bell
ߦ   Hero Down: Buffalo Police Officer Craig Lehner's Body Recovered
ߦ   Jim Schweitzer seeking Re-Election for Justice of the Peace Precinct 2
ߦ   Texas Police Chief: If your business doesn’t want cops as customers, just let us know
ߦ   Australians are buying guns on the dark web, report reveals
ߦ   Common Internet of Things Devices May Expose Consumers to Cyber Exploitation
ߦ   Constable Deputies Arrest Cell Phone Store Robbers
ߦ   Convicted Fugitive Gets Significant Sentence After Re-capture
ߦ   District Attorney Unveils Community Actions Plans
ߦ   FBI nabs 2 women suspected of bank heist try dressed as nuns
ߦ   Forney Man Sentenced to 151 Months in Federal Prison for Drug Offense
ߦ   Fort Worth Man Admits to Child Sex Trafficking
ߦ   Fourth Texas Man Pleads Guilty to Hate Crime for Assault Based on Victim’s Sexual Orientation
ߦ   Fugitive Lawyer and Accomplice Indicted for Escape
ߦ   Galveston Resident Convicted of Two Child Pornography Charges
ߦ   Grand Jury Indicts Dallas Man on Multiple Charges of Child Exploitation
ߦ   Hebbronville Man Sentenced for Smuggling Drugs
ߦ   Houston Man Guilty of Drug Trafficking in East Texas
ߦ   Ogg Outlines Plans for "More Diversion, Less Jail" for Small-Time Offenders
ߦ   Paris Police Dept - Daily Arrests/Activity Summary
ߦ   Recovering Underage Victims of Sex Trafficking and Prostitution
ߦ   Santa Fe Man Sentenced to 60 Years for Aggravated Sexual Assault
ߦ   Sheriff’s Office Looking for Suspect in Numerous Car Burglaries and Thefts
ߦ   Sweet Surrender: Detroit-area man arrested with doughnuts
ߦ   Texas Man Indicted for “Sextorting” Minors in Illinois
ߦ   Two Indicted in Texas Wire Fraud Conspiracy
ߦ   Zapata Couple and Convicted Felons Sentenced on Firearms Charges
ߦ   “Horrific scene”: House fire kills 5 kids and adult, sheriff says
ߦ   Two Indicted in Eastern District of Texas Wire Fraud Conspiracy
ߦ   A Moment Every Lawman Fears
ߦ   Annual Texas Lone Star Rally - Nov. 3-5
ߦ   Atlanta woman put toddlers in oven, turned it on
ߦ   Authorities make final arrest in border agent's killing
ߦ   Coast Guard suspends search for missing man, continues to monitor oil platform after explosion

   Next >>
Search Archives:
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that people don't have a right to film police.

St Louis, MO – The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals went against all other federal appeals courts and issued a decision that says recording the police in public settings is not a First Amendment right.

The ruling happened in late July, in their decision in the Akins vs. Knight case, according to KRCG.  The court’s decision upheld a 2004 District Court ruling that said “Neither the public nor the media has a First Amendment right to videotape, photograph, or make audio recordings of government proceedings that are by law open to the public.”

The 8th Circuit Appeals Court’s decision was called the decision of a “rogue court,” by Akins’ attorney Stephen Wyse, because it stands alone.

Every single other federal court ruling on the issue within the last 20 years has established that 1st Amendment right to record police officers as long as they are performing public duties.

In the Akins case, a man named Mark Akins created the anti-police group “Citizens for Justice,” because of his alleged ‘mistreatment’ at the hands of the Columbia PD.  The group has as a stated goal to monitor police activity.

During some type of group event, fellow protester Marion Jordan asked Akins to film Jordan handing a Columbia police officer a list of alleged grievances that he had with the police department.  Police officers asked Akins to stop filming, and he did.  But Jordan included the incident in his case of mistreatment by the CPD.

Wyse filed a motion for a rehearing on Tuesday, August 8, but said he didn’t think anything would come of it.  He and Akins said that they plan to appeal to the Supreme Court if their lower case appeals are not successful.

Do you think that people should be able to record police officers without their consent? We’d like to hear from you. Please let us know in the comments.

Absolutely, If I am not interfering in the police duties, I should have the right to film activity without bothering them to ask....May I!
If I were an officer, I would welcome the truth to be videoed at many scenes involving some of our more litigious citizenry.
Posted by Concerned Resident at 8/13/2017 12:56:55 PM

I think this goes back to "the majority rules" -- if you watch most video clips filmed at the scene they ALMOST all interfere with police activities -- if people cant film from afar, then they shouldn't be able to film. LOL, you can also tell "who's side their on" by WHAT they film -- bittersweet, good and bad, pro's and con's...
Posted by nameless at 8/14/2017 9:34:00 AM

Post a comment
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
  Facebook   Share link on Twitter Tweet  
© 1999-2017 The Police News. All rights reserved.