Eighth Circuit Court Rules That Citizens Have No Right To Record Police In Public
St. Louis, MO
More Today's News:
ߦ   Applications Being Accepted For Entry Level Police Officer - City of Santa Fe
ߦ   270th Session Graduates from the FBI National Academy
ߦ   Galveston Jury Sentences Man to 40 Years in Prison for Aggravated Sexual Assault of a Child
ߦ   Scammers target elderly this holiday season
ߦ   Two Texas Fishermen Sentenced for False Statements to Law Enforcement Agents
ߦ   2017 Holiday Patrol and Impaired Driver Initiative
ߦ   Another Firearms Smuggler Heads to Prison
ߦ   Central Texas police department gets creative in preventing package thefts this holiday season
ߦ   Dallas police chief trying new strategies to fill officer shortage
ߦ   Fatality Traffic Collision
ߦ   Fort Worth police run out of rewards for guns exchanged at buyback event
ߦ   Fraudsters Sentenced in Second Chance Lending Scheme
ߦ   Freeport fisherman to be sentenced for catching red snapper without commercial license
ߦ   Galveston council approves hiring of Dallas' police official as new chief
ߦ   Galveston Jury Finds Man Guilty of Possession of Child Pornography
ߦ   Houston bounty hunter facing detention hearing
ߦ   Information In Galveston "Little Jacob" Case Still Sought
ߦ   Law enforcement drones stolen from official's vehicle
ߦ   Missouri City couple found dead days apart
ߦ   New app collects spare change toward bail
ߦ   New FBI report details crime in 2016
ߦ   Paris Police Dept - Daily Activity/Arrests Summary
ߦ   Teacher raped by 4-time felon at Ferguson prison unit
ߦ   Teen robbed, raped while waiting at railroad crossing in Angleton
ߦ   Texas Municipal Police Association rallies for unity with police
ߦ   BACODA screens documentary on opioid epidemic
ߦ   Bloods Gang Member Sentenced for Federal Racketeering and Drug Offenses
ߦ   Burnet County Sheriff's Office - Inmate/Arrests Summary
ߦ   Childs Death Ruled Homicide - Update
ߦ   Constables Arrests Suspect Posing As Police Officer
ߦ   County Attorney Vince Ryan Sues Big Pharma
ߦ   Dallas Man Sentenced to 114 Months in Federal Prison for Bank Robberies
ߦ   Galveston County Sheriff's Office - Daily Bulletin
ߦ   Guilty Plea Brings Life Without Parole
ߦ   Guilty Pleas in Three Computer Crime Cases Involving Significant DDoS Attacks

   Next >>
Search Archives:
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that people don't have a right to film police.

St Louis, MO – The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals went against all other federal appeals courts and issued a decision that says recording the police in public settings is not a First Amendment right.

The ruling happened in late July, in their decision in the Akins vs. Knight case, according to KRCG.  The court’s decision upheld a 2004 District Court ruling that said “Neither the public nor the media has a First Amendment right to videotape, photograph, or make audio recordings of government proceedings that are by law open to the public.”

The 8th Circuit Appeals Court’s decision was called the decision of a “rogue court,” by Akins’ attorney Stephen Wyse, because it stands alone.

Every single other federal court ruling on the issue within the last 20 years has established that 1st Amendment right to record police officers as long as they are performing public duties.

In the Akins case, a man named Mark Akins created the anti-police group “Citizens for Justice,” because of his alleged ‘mistreatment’ at the hands of the Columbia PD.  The group has as a stated goal to monitor police activity.

During some type of group event, fellow protester Marion Jordan asked Akins to film Jordan handing a Columbia police officer a list of alleged grievances that he had with the police department.  Police officers asked Akins to stop filming, and he did.  But Jordan included the incident in his case of mistreatment by the CPD.

Wyse filed a motion for a rehearing on Tuesday, August 8, but said he didn’t think anything would come of it.  He and Akins said that they plan to appeal to the Supreme Court if their lower case appeals are not successful.

Do you think that people should be able to record police officers without their consent? We’d like to hear from you. Please let us know in the comments.

Absolutely, If I am not interfering in the police duties, I should have the right to film activity without bothering them to ask....May I!
If I were an officer, I would welcome the truth to be videoed at many scenes involving some of our more litigious citizenry.
Posted by Concerned Resident at 8/13/2017 12:56:55 PM

I think this goes back to "the majority rules" -- if you watch most video clips filmed at the scene they ALMOST all interfere with police activities -- if people cant film from afar, then they shouldn't be able to film. LOL, you can also tell "who's side their on" by WHAT they film -- bittersweet, good and bad, pro's and con's...
Posted by nameless at 8/14/2017 9:34:00 AM

Post a comment
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
  Facebook   Share link on Twitter Tweet  
© 1999-2017 The Police News. All rights reserved.