Eighth Circuit Court Rules That Citizens Have No Right To Record Police In Public
St. Louis, MO
More Today's News:
ߦ   March Top Ten Most Wanted Fugitives in Fort Bend County
ߦ   NFL player indicted by Harris County grand jury
ߦ   TDCJ Inmate Receives More Prison Time for Threatening Federal Judge...Again
ߦ   Chief of Staff for Former Federal Congressman Convicted for Obstructing Congressional Investigation
ߦ   Elderly woman reported missing
ߦ   Man Sues Police After He Watches Them Crush His $350K Ferrari
ߦ   Nine Iranians Charged in Massive Hacking Campaign on Behalf of Iran Government
ߦ   2 council members: After bombings, hire interim police chief for good
ߦ   24-Year-Old Mom's Dead Body Found in Texas Dumpster After She Was Fatally Shot
ߦ   Austin bomber on recording: ‘I wish I were sorry but I am not’
ߦ   How police finally found the Austin bomber
ߦ   'I Just Got Rid of It:' Mom Charged With Murder After Allegedly Tossing Newborn Onto Neighbor's Deck
ߦ   SAPD boasts only female police helicopter pilot in Texas
ߦ   The Marijuana Business: What You Need to Know
ߦ   TMPA's 2018 Annual Conference July 27-30
ߦ   3-Year Old Found At Bottom Of Motel Pool
ߦ   Baytown Man Convicted in Cocaine Distribution Conspiracy
ߦ   Calif. city aims to opt out of state's sanctuary law
ߦ   Channelview Man Convicted of Multiple Child Exploitation Charges
ߦ   Coast Guard interdicts lancha crews illegally fishing US waters
ߦ   Coast Guard medevacs woman boater near Port Aransas
ߦ   Corpus Christi Man Arrested on Child Pornography Charges
ߦ   Deputy Assaulted During Traffic Stop
ߦ   DPS IPC Program Receives National Recognition
ߦ   Eight Individuals with Alleged Ties to the Aryan Circle Arrested and Charged in Connection with Murder
ߦ   Frisco Man in Custody on Federal Charges Stemming from a Murder-For-Hire Plot
ߦ   Henderson County Man Guilty of Unlawfully Possessing Ricin
ߦ   Houston Man and Woman Sentenced for Beaumont Robbery Conspiracy
ߦ   La Porte Police Animal Control representatives caution residents when encountering bats
ߦ   Law officers identify Austin bombing suspect as 24-year-old Mark Conditt
ߦ   Officer praised for response after shooting at Md. high school
ߦ   Police chiefs criticize social media bill
ߦ   Police Seek Help In Fatal Hit-And-Run
ߦ   Texans Reminded to Stay Vigilant, Report Suspicious Activity to Authorities
ߦ   Thieves sought in furniture thefts

   Next >>
Search Archives:
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that people don't have a right to film police.

St Louis, MO – The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals went against all other federal appeals courts and issued a decision that says recording the police in public settings is not a First Amendment right.

The ruling happened in late July, in their decision in the Akins vs. Knight case, according to KRCG.  The court’s decision upheld a 2004 District Court ruling that said “Neither the public nor the media has a First Amendment right to videotape, photograph, or make audio recordings of government proceedings that are by law open to the public.”

The 8th Circuit Appeals Court’s decision was called the decision of a “rogue court,” by Akins’ attorney Stephen Wyse, because it stands alone.

Every single other federal court ruling on the issue within the last 20 years has established that 1st Amendment right to record police officers as long as they are performing public duties.

In the Akins case, a man named Mark Akins created the anti-police group “Citizens for Justice,” because of his alleged ‘mistreatment’ at the hands of the Columbia PD.  The group has as a stated goal to monitor police activity.

During some type of group event, fellow protester Marion Jordan asked Akins to film Jordan handing a Columbia police officer a list of alleged grievances that he had with the police department.  Police officers asked Akins to stop filming, and he did.  But Jordan included the incident in his case of mistreatment by the CPD.

Wyse filed a motion for a rehearing on Tuesday, August 8, but said he didn’t think anything would come of it.  He and Akins said that they plan to appeal to the Supreme Court if their lower case appeals are not successful.

Do you think that people should be able to record police officers without their consent? We’d like to hear from you. Please let us know in the comments.

Absolutely, If I am not interfering in the police duties, I should have the right to film activity without bothering them to ask....May I!
If I were an officer, I would welcome the truth to be videoed at many scenes involving some of our more litigious citizenry.
Posted by Concerned Resident at 8/13/2017 12:56:55 PM

I think this goes back to "the majority rules" -- if you watch most video clips filmed at the scene they ALMOST all interfere with police activities -- if people cant film from afar, then they shouldn't be able to film. LOL, you can also tell "who's side their on" by WHAT they film -- bittersweet, good and bad, pro's and con's...
Posted by nameless at 8/14/2017 9:34:00 AM

Post a comment
Email Address: (must be a valid address)
(will not be published or shared)
Comments: (plain text only)
Printer Friendly Format  Printer Friendly Format    Send to a Friend  Send to a Friend    RSS Feed  RSS Feed
  Facebook   Share link on Twitter Tweet  
© 1999-2018 The Police News. All rights reserved.